Department of Environmental Health
Riverside County
8490 Lemon Street, 10th Floor
Riverside, CA 92503
Decades
of Deceptions
on CA DEH are exposed:
Unmasking 30 plus years of lies told to Riverside Department
of Environmental
Health
Subject
of interest: Deborah
St Pierre, Robert J. Franko,
October 1973 Weber Heights Non-profit Association lies, AKA
Weber Valley Heights Water Association 1993 to?
Dear Sir/Madam,
I Request for Disassociation of State Small
Permit #1790 and
Well Driller Permit #16245 from 44100 Ginger Cir. Hemet CA. 92544,
1968 ROS
53/40par2. The property is shown on January 1970 assessors map
571-04, APN
571-040-002. Unless a paper trail provides proof of location
identifying a well
driller permit was issued for the Ginger Circle parcel a well was
drilled after
May 1, 1990 in violation of CA Water Code requiring a permit after
January 1,
1990.
The focus hereto is real property records
dating back from October
18, 1973 to present. The Deeds herein and a permit record is
specific to the singular property
records. More so what we have is a lack of valid permit records
related to this
following legal description. My deed of entitlement grants me
authority to 44100
Ginger Circle, Hemet CA. 92544, as was officially recorded Dec 20,
1968 by Record
of Survey 53/40par2, clearly noted on the January 1970 assessors
map 571-04,
AKA, APN 571-040-002 now known as the Reeds property.
Introduction
I, Gregory Reed am writing to you as the
legally recorded
owner of the real property known as the Reeds 44100 Ginger Cir, Exhibit A. My predecessors in interest
were Charles Campbell Exhibit B and the Gladstone’s, Exhibit
C. As mentioned above our aforementioned property is
shown as 1968 Record
of Survey in book 53, page 40, parcel2, Exhibit D.
The APN
#571-040-002 is shown
on the County of Riverside January 1970 Assessors map 571-04 as
par2, Exhibit
E. The County Recorder maps and recorded dates provide
realistic time
stamps identifying when 44100 Ginger Circle was officially noted
by the
County. These three
Grants of easements
benefit my parcel; Exhibit
F, Exhibit G,
and Exhibit H are associated to my parcel. Note the fact that Exhibit G also burdens my parcel. However, all three
easements run appurtenant those
lands named in each separate Exhibit
(A) as was incorporated to the independent Grants of
Easement. Note this fact;
not one Grants of Easement provided enjoyment rights to a Weber
Valley
Non-profit Association.
Therefore, the recitals are providing 100%
clear proof a
third party Association representing itself as a singular business
is excluded enjoyment
rights to the easements. Take
note of
this statement, “the association representatives are out of
control and have
continued lying to DEH over many years.” I will share info from a
deep
investigation that revealed many errors and facts. When the facts
are reviewed and
compiled in chronological order the truths becomes exceedingly
apparent. DEH
was lied to.
First and foremost neither my predecessors, nor
I ever
assigned property rights to a Weber Valley anything. My rights are
mine. Those real
property rights pass and run appurtenant the land as identified to
and for
Charles and Joann Campbell, ROS 53/40 par2 so noted in each of the
three (3)
Grants of Easement, Exhibit
F, Exhibit
G, and Exhibit H.
·
To be perfectly clear in
the 1985 Grant of
Easement, Exhibit
F page 1, line 10
that document identified the Campbell’s and Exhibit (A) thereto at page 4 lines
15-22 shows the Campbell’s.
·
Charles and Joann
Campbell’s 1990 Grant of
Easement, Exhibit
G, Exhibit (A) thereto,
at page 8, line 11-19
show ROS 53/40 par2 as a benefactor to those rights granted. That
is 44100
Ginger Circle.
·
On September 11, 1992 a new
Grant of Easement
provided one portion to the two part water system, Exhibit H. On page 1 line 4 Charles and
Joann Campbell are first
identified within the recitals. In Exhibit
(A) incorporated thereto on page 8 lines 11-19 the Campbell’s land
itself,
parcel 2 on a record of Survey map on file in book 53 page 40 of
Records of
Survey, Riverside County Records. The tank was useless without a
water supply.
·
The 1992 water delivery
system remained incomplete
without a storage facility.
·
On 9-11-1992 the two part
system was completed. Remember
this point; on June 11, 1992 the well
went into service per invoice #92-284as shown on
Exhibit G. However, a
CA Water Code 64,211 Permit requirement (b) comes into play. I ask
DEH to please
provide a copy of the technical report and permit application
identifying 44100
Ginger Circle APN 571-040-002 record of survey 53/40 par2 as any
portion of
State Small #1790.
·
Please provide a copy of
the State Small Water
Board permit applications as the parcels have changed over the
years. I would
like to see the entire list of well quantity test results
associated to the
well at 44100 Ginger Circle. Or confirm they do not exist.
·
However, if the test
records do not exist, I further
demand the State Small status associated with 44100 Ginger Circle
is deleted from
the records and permit 1790 be declared null and void for use at
44100 Ginger
Circle. Otherwise provide the dates and test results taken at the
well located
in 44100 Ginger Circle per the required CA Water Code 64,215.
After an extensive search of County Recorder
records and CA
Secretary of St ate Archives I could not identify records related
to Weber
Heights Non-profit Association existence. Nor are there records of
a Weber
Valley Heights Water Association (WVHWA) as having ownership to
any real property
as stated is CA Corp Code. It seems those persons claiming that
the homeowners
association was a real entity used unscrupulous tactics while
falsifying
information. Those perpetrators went on and created profits by
selling water at
an inflated price back to the legally entitled Grant of Easement
owners under
threat of termination of use for noncompliance to the illicit
demands. I am a
victim of those threats. Example,
Deborah St Pierre led a charge to
terminate Beverly Heats water because she grew some pot. The fact
remains that
Beverly Heath owned a right to the Grant of Easement and she was
in my opinion
extorted into compliance and when she refuse to comply with St
Pierre’s desire
Heath’s water supply was then severed. Read the Grant Exhibit F
Heath’s lot was
53/43 lot4. As I said, “OUT OF CONTROL” and that is partially
thanks to DEH’s
failure of enforcement.
Request
1.
What is the well driller
permit number
identifying 44100 Ginger Cir. Hemet CA. 92544, 1968 ROS 53/40par2,
January 1970
assessors map 571-04, APN 571-040-002?
2.
What is the property owners
name on the well
driller permit if any that clearly is identifying 44100 Ginger
Cir. Hemet CA.
92544, 1968 ROS 53/40par2, January 1970 assessors map 571-04, APN
571-040-002?
3.
On what day was the first
inspection of the well
at 44100 Ginger Cir. Hemet CA. 92544, 1968 ROS 53/40par2, January
1970 assessor
map 571-04, APN 571-040-002 completed?
4.
How many field inspection
reports specifically
identified any portion of 44100 Ginger Cir. Hemet CA. 92544, 1968
ROS
53/40par2, January 1970 assessors map 571-04, APN 571-040-002?
5.
What is the electrical
permit number for that
electrical service currently running the well at 44100 Ginger Cir.
Hemet CA.
92544, 1968 ROS 53/40par2, January 1970 assessors map 571-04, APN
571-040-002?
6.
What State Small Water
Board record first shows
the well at 44100 Ginger Cir. Hemet CA. 92544, 1968 ROS 53/40par2,
January 1970
assessors map 571-04, APN 571-040-002 was incorporated into State
Small Water
Board permit 1790?
7.
What DEH inspection
report(s) identifies the
quantity of water flow per minute from the well at 44100 Ginger
Cir. Hemet CA.
92544, 1968 ROS 53/40par2, January 1970 assessors map 571-04, APN
571-040-002?
8.
In 2003 only three (3)
service connections to
the well at 44100 Ginger Cir. Hemet CA. 92544, 1968 ROS 53/40par2,
January 1970
assessor map 571-04, APN 571-040-002 existed.
When was a water GPM production test completed at the well,
Exhibit G?
9.
What day was the water from
the well at 44100 Ginger Circle first
connected to that storage tank facility located on APN 571-030-039, Easement picture.
10.
In 2003 only 3 legally
entitled service
connections from 44100 Ginger Circle existed as seen within Exhibit N. Prior to
additional connections
being made when was the system tested for feasibility and
sustainability of the
water supply?
11.
Per County ORDINANCE NO.
682 (AS AMENDED THROUGH
682.4) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE REGULATING THE
CONSTRUCTION,
RECONSTRUCTION, ABANDONMENT AND DESTRUCTION OF WELLS AND
INCORPORATING BY
REFERENCE ORDINANCE NO. 725 Per Ord. 682Section 3. PERMIT
REQUIREMENTS.
" No
person or entity,
or agent, contractor, subcontractor, representative, or employee
thereof, shall
dig, drill, bore, drive, reconstruct or destroy (1) a well that is
to be, or
has been, used to produce or inject water, (2) a cathodic
protection well, (3)
a monitoring well or (4) geothermal heat exchange well, without
first filing a
written application to do so with the Department, and receiving
and retaining a
valid permit as provided herein. Said written application shall
contain a
statement which is substantially in the following form: I declare
under penalty
of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
information
furnished as part of this application is true and correct. I also
understand
that I am legally obligated to obey all requirements of state law
and Riverside
County ordinances in connection with the approval of this
application.
Property Owner’s Signature
______________________ Date
_________ "
I ask Who was the owner of record for the
permit to drill a
well at 44100 Ginger Cir. Hemet CA. 92544, 1968 ROS 53/40par2,
January 1970
assessors map 571-04, APN 571-040-002 in 1990?
12.
Per County ORDINANCE NO.
682 “Section 16. WELL
LOGS. Any person who has drilled, dug, excavated, or bored a well
subject to
this ordinance shall within sixty (60) days after completion of
the drilling”.
What is the driller record number identifying 44100 Ginger Cir.
Hemet CA.
92544, 1968 ROS 53/40par2, January 1970 assessors map 571-04, APN
571-040-002
in 1990?
At CO. Ord. 682Section SECTION 5 PERMIT
REVOCATION OR
SUSPENSION
A. “The Director may revoke or suspend a permit issued pursuant to
this
ordinance upon a finding that”:
1.
A permit violation exists
where any of the
following conditions are present: a.
the
permit was issued in error.
b. The permit was issued on the basis of incorrect information
supplied by the
permittee.
c. The permittee violated any of the provisions of this ordinance
or the
conditions and requirements attached to the permit.
Those persons representing Weber
Valley
Heights have lied to DEH and I have the proof attached hereto.
Please
be advised that
I am making a “Public Records Request of those items numbered
1-12 above.
I have reasonably described my request as being standard
identifiable records
or of singular record types. My request to the County of Riverside
is very
specific and focused. The requests are in relation to my land and
the appurtenant
water well therein. My request are including specifics related to
the water supply
and conduct line therefrom running to a holding tank and
distribution system therefrom.
There is a combination of properties making up additions to the
system dated
after April 27, 2003. Without the required water supply that State
Small Water
Board permit 1790 was expanded.
The additions seemingly remain in violation
of CA Water Code
Sec 64,211
Please answer this
question, how
did the unincorporated fictitious business being a third
independent party
becomes the authorized representative for legally entitled land
owner? Realistically
there never was a real Home
Owners non-profit association as DEH was led to believe. I ask you
to please check
with the Secretary of State and search for the association name.
Then check the
County Recorder for a DBA or land deed ownership rights in the
Weber Valley
association name. The attempt to create a 1973 Weber Heights
Non-profit
Association failed right from the start. Two points of failure
attributed to
the downfall,
1. An association did not own the wells as so identified October
18, 1973 at a foundation meeting followed with fraudulent claims
in the bylaws, Exhibit I.
2. Those initial founders did not file with the Secretary of State
as
identified necessary on October 18, 1973 or the group could go no
further. See Exhibits J & Exhibit K
Putting
all of the facts
together
1.
I ask DEH to provide a copy
of the actual legally
issued well drilling application and permit per Ord 682 sec3 identifying the 1990 home
owner of 44100
Ginger Circle, ROS 53/40 par2 APN 571-040-002.
2.
I ask DEH to provide a copy
with the address of all
inspections made at 44100 Ginger Circle after January 1, 1990 and
prior to Jan. 1, 2007.
3.
I ask DEH to provide a copy
of the electrical
permit allowing a 240 volt energy source be run across three (3)
independently
owned 1968 subdivided parcels ROS 53/40 par4, par3 and par2
thereto the well on
par2 AKA 44100 Ginger Circle. The source starts from a breaker box
located at
44240 Benton Road. Please include a copy of the electrical permit
number and
the finalized date & include the inspector information.
4.
Provide a copy of the
additional electrical
permit allowing a 120 volt circuit leg to be run an additional
925+ ft. from
the well at 44100 Ginger Circle to APN 571-030-039 that being
where the holding
tank is currently located. Provide the permit number and final
inspection date.
If no well drilling permit or records of inspections at 44100
Ginger Circle truly
exist, then the facts do indicate nothing was permitted as
required by the State
of CA and County of Riverside Ordinances.
Action
Requested
Item #1,
I demand
Riverside County DEH take an immediate action cease and desist all
relationships
of Well Driller Permit #16245 to 44100 Ginger Circle APN
571-040-002, Record of
Survey 53/40 par2.
As previously stated my deed is for parcel
571-040-002, Exhibit A, representing
44100 Ginger Circle.
The land was subdivided Dec. 20, 1968 as seen on Record of Survey
map book 53,
page 40 par2. Tax
assessor’s parcels number
is #571-040-002 as clearly seen on the January 1970 Assessors’ map
571-04 as
par2. County Recorder
records provide
proof the land herein question was never any portion of that land
where well
drilling permit #16245 was erroneously issued for use at. The named owner on permit
316245 was incorrect;
hence the permit was issued erroneously.
The fact Deborah St Pierre’s 44135 Perryman
Lane, APN
571-030-037 being the exact land and location identified within
the well
drilling application dated February 26, 1990, Record of Survey
book 53 page 47
lot3 as is so related to permit #16245 dated February 27, 1990. Note, that parcel of land
was never owned by a
Weber Valley Heights Association at any time.
Therefore the permit #16245 was issued in error because it
names a
fictitious business as the owner as seen on the February 26, 1990
application
for well drilling. It is uncontested that the permit Application
for #16245 named
Weber Valley Heights Ass. as the owner.
And Permit 16245 was issued on Feb. 27, 1990 for exclusive
use at that
specific location shown on the application. Therefore by law that
specific permit
was not valid for use at 44100
Ginger
Circle.
If DEH has any proof to the contrary please
provide copies to
me. If any permit
issued in error is
transferable to a separate location and owner other than that
shown on the
application for a permit please provide me a copy of the paper
trail granting
such a transfer occurred. Be
sure to include
the approval signatures and dates. If such action happened I ask
DEH or Council
to provide the CA Code of authority allowing for such a transfer
or action. If the
requested transfer information related
to the permitting process of permit #16245 does not exist, then I
demand DEH to
please follow the facts to logical conclusions. Somebody has
continued to lie
to DEH and it was not me. However, I have made DEH aware of
blunders ‘and errors.
Item #2,
per CA
Water Code title 22, Sec 64211 permit requirements, seemingly
State Small
Permit #1790 was somehow wrongfully allowed to incorporate the
intentionally non permitted,
yet, illegally drilled well per Riv. Co. ORD. 682 Sec3. Remove the
association od State Small 1790 to 44100 Ginger Circle.
I ask DEH to provide technical inspection
reports prior to
January 1, 2008 identifying 44100 Ginger Circle, APN 571-040-002.
I ask DEH to provide
field reports from January 1, 1985 to present showing a well at
44240 Benton
Road.
If no such records as in item #2 exist prior to
January 1, 1994,
I demand DEH cease any relationship of State Small permit #1790
with 44100
Ginger Circle, APN 571-040-002.
Item #3,
Per
Water Resource Code 64,215 I ask DEH to please provide a copy of
the per minute
water supply quantity from the well identified as 44100 Ginger
Circle, APN 571-040-002.
Fact, Reed well does not qualify to supply more
than 9
gallons per minute at the well. Therefore the system fails the
mandatory requirements
of three (3) gallons per minute per connection as stated in Water
Resource Code
64,215. Once again I demand DEH remove the association of permit
#1790 to 44100
Ginger Circle, APN 571-040-002.
Item #4
in 2003
the singular system had only 3 service connections from the 44100
Ginger Circle well
to the storage tank location that was connected after June 11,
1992.
The total volume of water supply in the tank
fails to qualify
the singular system as a state small system able to support 3
service
connections. Please
provide the DEH
water quantity report as in gallons per minute (GPM) test results
for the system
from the well to the storage tank. At the well the supply was 9
gallons per
min. At the holding tank it was 4 GPM.
In 1992 the Ronald Mark Leuschen property is where one
Grant of Easement
was authored for the provision of rights to the holding tank
located on the
eastern side of APN 571-030-039, Exhibit
Land Exhibit M.
In 2003 a DEH archived map showed 3 locations
that were then
connected to the singular system (W3). That DEH map is enclosed
hereto as Exhibit N. Please
provide evidenced paperwork
showing when 44100 Ginger Circle, APN 571-040-002 was first noted
and
authorized as a State Small Water Board supplier. The fictitious name
Weber Valley is not the
owner of 44100 Ginger Circle nor were any rights recited in favor
of Weber
Valley.
If testing of water supply quantity did not
happen I demand
DEH remove any association of permit 1790 to 44100 Ginger Circle,
APN
571-040-002 as a water supplier for more than 2.88 service
connections the
system fails.
Item #5
what year
was the deliver/storage system first connected to the well at
44100 Ginger Circle.
The system is currently utilizing an illegally
run energized
source, yet why is the system considered a legally recognized
water source? What
date did the official DEH paper trail start
showing test results from 44100 Ginger Circle as a water supplier?
A 240 volt
energy
source is running 330 foot from 44240 Benton Road APN 571-040-004,
then across
571-040-003 another 330 foot, to 44100 Ginger Cir for another 165
+or- feet,
into a well case another 588
feet deep
to the bottom of the well. This
clearly
described system is being called a portion of State Small Water
Board permit
#1790. Knowing this
fact alone should
provide cause enough to terminate the illegally run energy source.
The system
is illegally connected to a high power energy source so why is it
being allowed
to continue running?
Item
#5-B, Please
answer this, by what County Codes, or
State Law is that illegally ran, 240 volt electrical situation
being allowed to
continue and operate as the energy source to the well? See, CASE
NO: CV1604789,
Exhibit
O and case file CV1903110,
Exhibit
P. It’s kind of
strange how the cases with references to illegally run State Small
water system
wiring just went away, but the illegally run wiring remained.
Item #6 I ask DEH to
provide me a
copy of all well and electrical inspection records thereto
identifying 44100
Ginger Circle from 1989 to present.
The electrical is something related to the
overall operation
of the water delivery system, right? If an approval of electrical
records does
not exist thereby being dated prior to November 11, 1991 I demand
DEH cease all
association of 44100 Ginger Circle to State Small permit #1790 and
well
drilling permit #16245. See
CA Water
Code Section 64,211. The system was not connected but until after
June 11, 1992.
I have an invoice for the first time installation of the water
pump and
electrical thereto. The current system is in violation of CA Water
Code Section
64,211.
Item #7
what
recorded file within DEH archives identifies the transfer of
easement rights of
authority to a Weber Valley Heights?
Corp. Code, 18115,
The
acquisition, transfer, or encumbrance of an interest in real
property by an
unincorporated association shall be executed by its president
and secretary or
other comparable officers, or by a person specifically
designated by a
resolution adopted by the association, or by a committee or
other body or
person authorized to act by the governing principles of the
association.
Note; Weber Valley Heights Association as a singular
business entity does
not own a recorded title of authority to the lands herein
question.
Item#8
does DEH have a
copy of any statements of authority naming Weber Valley Heights
as the singular
authority for three separate independently authored Grants of
Easements.
CA Corp Code Sec
18120. (a) An
unincorporated association may record in a county in which it
has an interest
in real property a verified and acknowledged statement of
authority stating the
name of the association, and the names, title, or capacity of
its officers and
other persons who are authorized on its behalf to acquire,
transfer, or
encumber real property. For the purposes of this section,
statement of
authority includes a certified copy of a statement recorded in
another county.
Item#9
two
independent systems were identified by Greg Dellenbach and Deborah
St Pierre, Exhibit Q and Exhibit R. Therefore, how, as in by
what paper trail did
permit #1790 incorporate real property easement entitlements that
run
appurtenant 13 separately owned parcels into one permit? Please provide proof of
how two systems have
become 1.
Weber Valley Heights Water Association is
nothing more than a
fake Home Owners Association that does not own land or well
entitlements in the
Association name. DEH was easily fooled into believing the
non-profit was a
real deal when in fact it was the antithesis.
If DEH was counting on what St Pierre told DEH
please take
note, she is a bold faced liar who makes up stuff to fit her
desires. Did DEH
become a victim of her evil plan? Think about how long
the lies have
continued.
This is a fact; three Grants of easements do
not name a Weber
Valley anything as a benefactor.
Attorney Alex Hershey told St Pierre and me
that the
association did not own rights to the wells and the association as
a whole did
not have a legal authority to control the wells. Because I was
there, I know
what was said. At the point when we left the Attorney’s office
Mrs. St Pierre
asked me not to tell the other property owners what we had
learned. After that
meeting, and here request of me, I suspected that St Pierre was
hiding something.
My investigations from that point and they have led me to this
point. St Pierre is a
liar and I have proof of it.
This
will make since of
the mess that was created by certain persons.
Mrs. Deborah St Pierre and Mr. Robert (Bob)
Franko had
neighbors believing Weber Heights Non Profit Association was a
real bona fide association;
however it was not, Exhibit
J. Weber
Valley Heights is a sham. February 26, 1990 somehow
certain neighbor’s
pooled money together to drill a well on a high knoll at the so
called
non-profit President Bob Frankos place, better known as 44135
Perryman Lane,
AKA APN 571-030-037, clearly legible on permit application for
#16245, Exhibit T.
See the 1990 recorded Grant DEED owners. There was no
mistake in acquiring the pertinent specifics to identify St Pierre
and Frankos to be property, Exhibit S.
However the real property
in question was not owned by Weber Valley Heights Association as
shown on that February 26, 1990 permit
application and permit #16245,
Exhibit S.
It was L.O. Lynch well drilling employee Charlene Robbins that
made a well
drilling applications using very specific information provided to
her, Exhibit T and Exhibit U. RIV County
Record and CA Secretary of State Records prove the Association
was/is not
registered and having a DBA or a non-profit corporate status.
People like me
were led to believe the Association as a singular unit owned the
wells, storage
tanks and easements. However, the legally granted and recorded
rights to
easements exclude the Weber Valley Heights Water Association as a
benefactor of
the recited entitlements conveyed therein, Exhibit
F, Exhibit
G and Exhibit H.
When reviewing DEH archived records, why was
44135 Perryman
Lane named as the well location and the mailing address of 44135
Perryman Lane
used, Exhibit
W? After all as
DEH claimed there is no known working well at that location,
right? But for
Deborah St Pierre certain lies have continued
to fool DEH staffing.
1.
Why were 44240 Benton Rd
and 44100 Ginger Circle
scrubbed as the real property locations for the State Small permit
#1790 wells?
2.
Where is proof of
entitlement to well (1)? Well
(2) is Exhibit F and well (3) is Exhibit G
as seen on Exhibit N, three wells are
identified on Exhibit N, noting the (2003 date) on the archived map?
3.
Why are the true addresses
44240 Benton Rd and
44100 Ginger Circle not identified in DEH inspection reports from
2005, Exhibit
V, 2007 Exhibit W, 2010 Exhibit X
and Exhibit
Y?
In my opinion DEH has erred by including that
non permitted
well at 44100 Ginger Circle into State Small permit #1790. That
DEH action was
in violation of CA Water Codes 64,211, RIV CO Ord 682 Sec3 and RIV
CO Building
and Safety Ordinance. DEH
has allowed
the system to continue operation even after being made fully aware
of the
violations.
DEH now has many unanswered questions and I have but one.
1.
Why is DEH refusing to
follow the truth and
correct the miscarriage of justice I have been subjected to?
I think I am being denied due process of the law and I have been
injured but for
the DEH negligence of fiduciary duty to uphold County of Riverside
Ordinance
682 and CA Water Codes 64,216, 64,211,
64,214
and 64,216.
I demand the County Of Riverside end the charade partially created
by DEH. I
ask DEH to please put an end to the smoke and mirrors pony show
that I have
revealed was carried out by so called officers of DEH and those
persons who
pretend Weber Valley Heights Water Association owns the land and
wells
that are appurtenant thereto land not owned by any singular
fictitious business
named Weber Valley Heights Water Association, reread Exhibit, G
page 1. That grant of easement did not provide benefits to a Weber
anything. In fact the Grants of Easement Deeds did 100%
exclude
any fictitiously name benefactor all rights of enjoyment, period.
Ask your Council.
Conclusion,
Please provide a valid copy of the DEH issued
well permit application
as was required Riv. CO. Ord.682 Sec. 3 after April 1, of 1990
that is applicable
to 44100 Ginger Circle. The Permit application will need to
include the land owner,
lot location as clearly identified were required by law for
any/all water well
permit to be issued according to Board of Supervisors of the
County of
Riverside, Ordains that Ordinance No. 682 as was amended in its
entirety
effective January 1, 1990.
If the requested well drilling application for
44100 Ginger
Circle, Record of Survey book 53 page 40 par2, APN 571-040-002 and
an
electrical permit as required by law thereto the existing well
cannot be
located, I hereby demand, without reservation, that DEH remove all
erroneous
information that is/ was falsified as being related to 44100
Ginger Circle
including any relation to permit #16245.
Furthermore I demand DEH to completely disassociate all
erroneously created
information to State Small permit #1790 as being applicable to
44100 Ginger
Circle.
As mentioned previously DEH was lied to in relation to the
truthfulness of what
really happened with the permitting process of #16245 and State
Small #1790. I have
provided the absolute truth to the
best of my knowledge and I’m willing to testify in a court of law
this is the
whole truth, so help me god.
I pray DEH follow the trails of deception cast
upon its
officials and therefore rectify those errors as requested hereto.
Thank
You
Sincerely
Mr.
Reed
